Why Is It So Hard to Find "Just One" Blazor Component?

 


Why Is It So Hard to Find "Just One" Blazor Component?

Blazor is a fantastic framework. It lets C# developers build interactive web UIs without touching a single line of JavaScript. But as the framework matures, a common frustration is bubbling to the surface: the state of its UI component libraries. While there are many powerful options available, they often present a frustrating, all-or-nothing dilemma. Why can't you just grab a single, well-made component without buying into an entire ecosystem?

Your observation is spot on. Unlike the React world, where developers can easily find and install individual components—from a simple tooltip to a complex data grid—the Blazor landscape feels different. It's an issue of walled gardens.


The "All-or-Nothing" Problem

Most major Blazor UI libraries, both paid and free, are built as comprehensive suites. They provide dozens of components, from buttons and inputs to charts and schedulers. This is great if you're starting a new project and want a consistent look and feel out of the box.

However, these libraries almost always come with a catch: their own component syntax and design system.

For example, a button in one popular library might be defined like this: <RadzenButton Text="Click me" ButtonStyle="ButtonStyle.Success" />

While in another, it could be: <MudButton Variant="Variant.Filled" Color="Color.Primary">Click me</MudButton>

This isn't just a cosmetic difference. These components are deeply integrated with their parent library's styling, theming, and sometimes even their own specific JavaScript interop. This tight coupling creates a "walled garden" effect. Once you commit to one library, mixing and matching components from another source becomes a messy, often impossible, task. You're locked in.


The React Approach: A La Carte Components

The JavaScript ecosystem, particularly for React, evolved differently. While comprehensive libraries like Material-UI (MUI) exist, there's also a thriving culture of independent, single-purpose components. Need a date picker? You can npm install react-datepicker and be done with it. You don't need to adopt an entire library's design philosophy just to get one piece of functionality.

This "à la carte" approach offers several key advantages:

  • Flexibility: You can mix and match the best components from various sources to build a truly custom UI.

  • Lightweight: You only add the code you need, avoiding the bloat of an entire unused component suite.

  • Easier Maintenance: Updating a single, isolated component is far simpler than upgrading a monolithic library.


The Path Forward for Blazor

So, why is the Blazor world this way? Part of it is the ecosystem's relative youth. Many of the foundational libraries were built to provide a complete "solution" to make Blazor immediately viable for enterprise-level applications.

But as the community grows, we're seeing a shift. More open-source projects are focusing on creating standalone components. The introduction of WebAssembly (WASM) and improved JS interop allows for easier integration of JavaScript-based "headless" UI libraries (like Headless UI or Radix) that provide functionality without enforcing styling.

For Blazor's UI ecosystem to truly flourish, it needs to embrace this spirit of modularity. The future isn't just about having more component libraries; it's about having more individual, high-quality components that work seamlessly with each other, regardless of their origin. Until then, developers will be stuck peering over the walls of their chosen garden, wishing they could just grab that one perfect component from next door.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Yes, Blazor Server can scale!

Offline-First Strategy with Blazor PWAs: A Complete Guide 🚀

Customizing PWA Manifest and Icons for a Polished User Experience 🚀